Share full text access. Please review our Terms and Conditions of Use and check box below to share full-text version of article. Get access to the full version of this article. View access options below. You previously purchased this article through ReadCube. Institutional Login.
- TeacherS iDeA PaRtY > Fun ~ Creative ~ Innovative !.
- février | | Systèmes policiers Européens XVIIIe-XIXe siècle.
- 555 commentaires;
- Same Old Brand New You.
- The Fragile Things (Part I).
- Symposium | Cinema of Louis Malle.
Log in to Wiley Online Library. Purchase Instant Access. View Preview. Learn more Check out.
Pluralism and the Idea of the Republic in France
Volume 15 , Issue 1 January Pages Related Information. Close Figure Viewer. Browse All Figures Return to Figure. Previous Figure Next Figure. Email or Customer ID. Forgot your password? Forgot password? Old Password. He insists on their deliberate simplicity, their familiar diction, a naturalness that American poetry had never reached before , characteristics which might well appeal in a country where literary language has always been far removed from everyday language and appeared even more strikingly so after when conversational French became more informal.
He contextualizes the importance of the object and likens it to a rehabilitation of objects in other contemporary arts, painting in particular. Quoting Alain Robbe-Grillet , he evokes a form of revelation that is not mystical but plainly photographic, thus delineating the evolution of the French poetry to come from a poetics of presence to a poetics of literality. In the conversation with Charles Dobzynsky and Serge Fauchereau that inaugurates the issue, Roubaud says that he had known about Williams, Pound and Cummings but, like everybody else, had been under the impression that American poetry was something minor and not very interesting.
Symposium | Cinema of Louis Malle | Cinema Studies
When Fauchereau asks him what attracted him to the Objectivists, Roubaud answers:. What struck me is that these were people who came after their elders, William Carlos Williams, Ezra Pound, that is after people who were innovators and who, in order to continue beyond, found a solution that was not that of the Surrealists. I admire the Surrealists and Dadaists enormously but if you want to write in France you have to determine your stance in opposition to them; so seeing people who took Pound and Williams as starting-points and who went in directions that were markedly different from those we were familiar with in France, that really struck me.
Europe , , In the mids, Roubaud was also reflecting on French verse. In his book on the demise of the alexandrine, he criticized what he terms the vers libre standard standard free verse propagated by the Surrealists and increasingly popular worldwide.
The alternative poetic models he turned toward are all strongly formal and, unsurprisingly, Roubaud took a keen interest in Zukofsky in whom he may have seen a predecessor, a poet who shared his concern for the renewal of form and his growing distrust for avant-garde gestures. For Roubaud, Zukofsky offered not only an original combination of radical politics and formal experimentation but, unlike Pound, had opted for the adequate politics Marxism and poetics, i. First, she translated a poem of formidable formal complexity and semantic obduracy.
And she did so in a very personal way, making forceful decisions, choosing to translate the form rather than the words. Hocquard here clarifies the stakes of an Objectivist reception orchestrated by poets as opposed to academics: the focus is not on historical reconstruction but contemporary creation, the shaping of the field.
In hindsight, the conference contributed to the recognition and canonization of the Objectivists, and sealed a Franco-American friendship 18 on the grounds of a common lineage and a certain interpretation of these ancestors. The conference also revealed diverging interpretations of the Objectivists, indicative of fault-lines among their admirers in France and beyond.
Aïe Aïe Aïe !
Carl Rakosi, the sole surviving Objectivist, was invited at the conference and, as he made known in a March letter to Poetry Flash , strongly disagreed with many things he heard. Yves di Manno described the Objectivist meeting as a turning point in his life and a leap into the public debate. But their work bears the mark of the theoretical investigations of this era of suspicion.
It is precisely this common theoretical background that enabled a true conversation with the Language Poets. Composed over several decades and only published in full posthumously, Testimony: The United States , Recitative 22 portrays turn-of-the-century America from the statements of courtroom witnesses that Reznikoff sampled and versified. What makes this book so moving is precisely its literality, which is the contrary of literature. Duplication logically reveals the model in a new light, relentless, overwhelming. Through repetition, in that gap, that distance, which is the very theatre of mimesis, suddenly you see something else in the model, which now loses its value as original, as origin.
It is prodigious how this infinitesimal transfer of the same text, this simple passage from one form to another, produces meaning—and how violently—while operating, by means of language, a considerable cleansing. Hocquard , It embodies his concept of elucidation. For Hocquard, the business of poetry is the logical organization of thought or, in Wittgensteinian terms, the logical clarification of thought. As such, it has nothing more in common with literature than with any other language-based activity Hocquard, , Both first and second literality share an awareness that the real is inaccessible and that language is bound to fail in its attempt at representation.
But while the first literality, initiated by Albiach and Royet-Journoud in the s, experienced the impassable gap between words and things as a form of terror or ecstasy, the second literality, predicated on differential repetition, joyfully engages in grammatical investigations of a very practical nature. The foundation on this second literality marked an important turning point in French poetry, away from mid-century Kojevian and Blanchotian negativity. It offered a theoretical frame for all the techniques of sampling and appropriation to come.
It also marked a turning point in the French reception of the Objectivists. The Objectivists, of course, were duly rounded in the camp of the literalists. Edited by Alferi and Cadiot, these strikingly attractive page volumes made a clean break with the avant-garde magazines of the s by presenting themselves as cross-generational tool boxes rather than coterie-driven manifestos and works in progress.
à : to, toward, towards
The arrest of poetry: already an old story. On the one hand, the fetishistic craftsmen, keepers of forms and savoir-faire. RLG1 , The two volumes do not offer any easy answer but a rich toolbox. In the s, a new generation of poets stripped the Objectivists of these formalist, autotelic overtones and used Testimony to engineer a pragmatic poetics.
- Nos tutelles!
- La France deviendra-t-elle une République islamique ? - Liberté d'expression.
- Fat Control: The NET Equation!
- Institut interdisciplinaire d’anthropologie du contemporain - Wahnich Sophie!
- Money, Real Quick: The story of M-PESA (Guardian Shorts Book 22)!
- The Adventures of the Little Woman, Her Dog and the Pedlar.
- French-English Dictionary (35,273 Entries).
Part of the third-generation surge of interest for the Objectivists can be ascribed to Jean-Marie Gleize and his young associates, the post-poets. Through his critical writing and his teaching Gleize has effectively renewed and reshaped the interest in the Objectivists. Even Oppen, much less of an ostensible formalist than Zukofsky, reaffirmed the importance of objectification in his interview with L. He also refused to call himself a poet. The stance for or against poetry as an independent genre creates a sharp line of demarcation in the world of French poetry. More than specific contents, it is the forms and formalizations of various types of knowledge that I am after, that I hope to invent.
Leibovici, a, II, and all Jakobsonian and Genettian definitions of poeticity founded on a gap between poetic language and ordinary language.